Owens Corning Oakridge Shingles Lawsuit

Owens Corning Shingles Lawsuit – A Look At The History

Owens Corning is a well-known brand, known worldwide for its quality materials used in the manufacture of roofing systems. In fact, many roofing contractors consider the brand to be one of the best brands when it comes to roofing. In a case study published by the National Advertising Association, Owens Corning was ranked as the fourth best brand among all roofing brands. In this article, we shall see how the company has settled a lawsuit in a prominent court in the USA. Let’s take a look at the details.

Owens Corning Oakridge Shingles Lawsuit

In 2021, a group of plaintiffs from Oregon filed a lawsuit against Owens Corning for exposing them to toxic chemicals during the manufacturing process of their roofing systems. The company denies the claims and says that they do not expose their customers to any dangerous substances. However, the court did grant them a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs who say that they suffered from health problems after using the roofs made by Owens Corning. The court ruled that the company did indeed expose their customers to such dangerous substances and awarded them compensation for this loss of income and suffering.

The legal issue had aroused after the company had submitted documents showing that their OSHA standards were not complied with when installing their roofing materials.

Several OSHA employees were then found to have falsified records in order to qualify for lower pay in the years 2021. After discovering this, the lawyers of the plaintiffs filed a complaint against Owens Corning, charging that they were aware of the falsity for years but did nothing to stop it. This led to the current case. If the lawyers are successful in getting damages, they will be able to claim back every penny that they are entitled to due to the employer’s negligence.

The case of the Oregon claim has attracted the attention of several prominent attorneys, including Bill Chandler of San Diego.

He says that he plans to file the lawsuit on behalf of all the workers who suffered from the dangerous effects of using OSHA approved roofing materials. The main claim that the plaintiffs are making is that Owens Corning knew or should have known that its roofing materials used during the building of its dormers contained lead that can be highly dangerous for workers. Despite this knowledge, the company did not take any action to prevent the danger from occurring. It did not change its manufacturing processes until after the case had been won and all the evidence linking the substance to health problems had been gathered.

There is no doubt that the company will be facing tough times as a result of the legal case.

However, it is believed that the cost of the lawsuit will not deter it from continuing with its business. According to court records, the company earned over $4 billion from its Oakridge production facilities in the last decade. Some shareholders are holding a shareholders meeting to decide whether to go ahead with the lawsuit. It is expected that the outcome of the meeting will depend largely on how the defense attorney handling the case intends to use the information garnered to win the lawsuit.

While it is too early to say what the outcome of the lawsuit will be, there is speculation that the outcome could prove negative for the company.

Many shareholders are worried that they may lose some of their investment as a result of the lawsuit. The lawsuit could also cost the company a lot of money, especially if it is found that the shingles used in the roof of its buildings contained lead. In the end, Owens Corning will have to recoup its losses from the shingles it sold and the health risks caused by them. If it is proven that the materials used in producing the shingles did contain lead, it could result in a huge fine for the company. As of now, the lawsuit has no definite outcome.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Lawyer Aspect